Showing posts with label House. Show all posts
Showing posts with label House. Show all posts

Tuesday, 16 July 2013

Comparing Subsidies for the House and Senate Health Care Bills

library Comparing Subsidies for the House and Senate Health Care BillsStephanie Rennane, C. Eugene Steuerle

Reprinted with permission of Tax Analysts.

The text below is an excerpt from the complete document. Read the full report in PDF format.

Consider an employer who bears an equal cost for their employees and must choose between the proposed subsidy for those on the exchange and the current subsidy for those who get employer-provided health insurance. What are the consequences for the employee? This article discusses the results for the employee under the current health care bills in the House and the Senate.

The flurry of proposed health subsidies in Congress present alternatives to the current employer-provided health insurance system. Consider an employer who bears an equal cost for their employees and must choose between the proposed subsidy for those on the exchange and the current subsidy for those who get employerprovided health insurance. Under the exchange, this employer would be able to provide higher cash wages for their employees but would be subject to higher payroll taxes and would likely pay a penalty for not providing health insurance. Using the current system, the employer would pay out lower cash wages and payroll taxes, but would also be responsible for the cost of health insurance. And the employee?

(End of excerpt. The entire report is available in PDF format.)


View the original article here

Tax Code and Health Insurance Coverage : Before the House Committee on the Budget

library Tax Code and Health Insurance CoverageLeonard E. Burman

The nonpartisan Urban Institute publishes studies, reports, and books on timely topics worthy of public consideration. The views expressed are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the Urban Institute, its trustees, or its funders.

In this testimony Burman argues that there are limitations to using tax credits to expand health insurance coverage. A program of health insurance tax credits combined with reforms of the market for nongroup health insurance could significantly expand coverage, but at a very high cost. The testimony summarizes the current tax treatment of health insurance, the effects of tax subsidies on coverage and health care costs, and discusses ways that tax credits might affect health coverage. Burman offers recommendations and adds that the most cost-effective approach to expanding health insurance coverage may not be a tax subsidy at all, but an expansion of an existing public program, such as Medicaid, S-CHIP, or Medicare.

The text below is Leonard Burman's oral testimony.
Read the full written testimony in PDF format.

Chairman Spratt, Ranking Member Ryan, and members of the committee: Thank you for inviting me to discuss the role of the tax system in expanding access to health insurance. This hearing is extremely timely. About 47 million Americans under age 65, including 9 million children, lack health insurance. They are less likely to get important preventive screenings while healthy, and they receive lower-quality care when sick. And, the public ultimately shoulders the burden of paying for the medical treatment of those lacking insurance, through higher taxes or higher health care costs.

The recent debate over the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (S-CHIP) has focused on the best way to cover uninsured children, and many, including the president, have suggested that the tax system is the answer. I’d like to focus on the potential and limitations of using tax credits to expand coverage, as that is the only feasible way to use the tax system to help lower-income households obtain health insurance. Mr. Ryan has cosponsored a bill, H.R. 914, to provide a refundable credit up to $4,000 per year to help lower-income households purchase insurance in the individual nongroup market, similar to an earlier proposal from President Bush.

In considering such options, it is best to keep in mind Hippocrates’ dictum: “Do no harm.” A carefully designed program of health insurance tax credits combined with effective reforms of the market for nongroup health insurance could significantly expand health insurance coverage, although potentially at very high cost per newly insured person. And proposals to subsidize nongroup insurance alone with no meaningful provisions to fix the inherent failings in the nongroup health-insurance market would cause millions of Americans to lose their health insurance coverage. Those who suffer from chronic health conditions or have low incomes would be most vulnerable.

My testimony briefly summarizes the current tax treatment of health insurance, the effects of tax subsidies on coverage and health care costs, discusses ways that tax credits might affect health care coverage, and concludes with some recommendations.

The text above is Leonard Burman's oral testimony.
Read the full written testimony in PDF format.

The views expressed are those of the author and should not be attributed to the Urban Institute, its trustees, or its funders.


View the original article here